JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 4, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Elena Reales Gutiérrez

✓Claimant Pedro Jose  Beltran Forero Vs. Instituto De Seguros Sociales

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Unico Administrativo De San Gill Y El Juzgado Segundo Civil Del Circuito De San Gil. Se Resolvio Remitir El Expediente De La Referencia Al Juzgado Unico Administrativo Del Circuito De San Gil Para Que Resuelva La Accion En Cuestion.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra El Instituto De Seguros Sociales
  • Competencia de Juzgado Unico Administrativo
Instituto De Seguros Sociales
  • Escrito presentado tiene carácter de acción de tutela y no de solicitud de apertura de incidente de desacato para el pago de mesadas pensionales
3 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Remitir, por intermedio de Secretaría General, el expediente de la referencia al Juzgado Único Administrativo del Circuito de San Gil, para que resuelva la acción de tutela de Pedro José Beltrán Forero contra el Instituto de Seguros Sociales.
  2. Segundo. Comunicar, por medio de Secretaría General, el presente auto al Juzgado
  3. Segundo. Civil del Circuito de San Gil, con el fin de que tenga conocimiento sobre lo aquí resuelto por la Corte Constitucional. Para el efecto se remitirá copia del presente auto.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.